Enjoying the #PictureShow #app. Manipulated #macro photo of a fruit fly, possibly from another dimension.
8 months ago • Notes“Why have philosphers always spoken of love? That’s how philosophy started - No, no. It’s not possible. I have an empty head on love in general. And as for the reason philosophy has often spoken of love, I’d either have nothing to say or I’d just be reciting cliches.
One of the first questions one could pose… I’m just searching a bit… is the question of the difference between the who and the what. Is love the love of someone or the love of something? Okay supposing I loved someone. Do I love someone for the absolute singularity of who they are? I love you because you are you. Or do I love your qualities, your beauty, your intelligence? Does one love someone, or does one love something about someone? The difference between the who and the what at the heart of love, separates the heart. It is often said that love is the movement of the heart. Does my heart move because I love someone who is an absolute singularity, or because I love the way that someone is? Often love starts with some type of seduction. One is attracted because the other is like this or like that. Inversely, love is dissapointed and dies when one comes to realise the other person doesnt merit out love. The other person isn’t like this or like that. So at the death of love, it appears that one stops loving another not because of who they are, but because they are such and such. That is to say, the history of love, the heart of love, is divided between the who and the what.”
- Jacques Derrida




